As our report upon vaping showed, Minnesotans, specifically the youth, are greatly misinformed about the risks connected with e-cigarettes and other vaping items.
In 2020, just 18. 2 percent associated with Minnesota youths said they will considered e-cigarettes to be much less harmful than regular smoking cigarettes, down from 35. two percent of respondents within 2017.
That trend is not particular to Minnesota. Nationally, the amount of people who consider e-cigarettes plus vaping to be equally or maybe more harmful than cigarettes continues to be growing in recent years, leading to the decline in the number of people changing from traditional cigarettes in order to e-cigarettes.
Exactly why is this so?
The big culprit is false information –– anti-tobacco activists, within their quest for a nicotine-free community, continue to spread information demonizing e-cigarettes and other less dangerous vaping products.
Just take, for example , a recent study that heavily overestimates the risk related to vaping. The study , which has since been retracted for spreading misinformation, showed results claiming that vaping kills as much as 650, 000 people annually.
What scientific evidence really says about e-cigarettes and vaping
The fact of the matter is that, unlike traditional cigarettes, vaping allows users to consume nicotine in vapor form. This means that users inhale little to no toxins like the ones produced when cigarettes are burned and are associated with cardiovascular and respiratory illnesses and deaths. So relatively speaking, vaping is significantly much safer than smoking –– as much as 95 percent.
While there have been cases of deaths and illnesses associated with vaping, these cases have been found to be due to THC-laced products that have been flooding the market. Indeed e-cigarettes are not without their risks, but they present a better alternative that could reduce the harm due to traditional cigarettes, especially among adults that already smoke or young people that are prone to start smoking.
And if the aim is to reduce public health harm caused by smoking, it makes little sense to wage a war against safer alternatives to cigarettes.